Restricting Students’ Expression: Does Sem’s New Dress Code Support Our School’s Ideals?

By Sophia Kruger ‘22

In the age of Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, self-expression is everything. Teenagers have access to numerous platforms that allow them to share who they are with the world anytime and anywhere. One outlet that has always been used for expression is clothing; our clothes tell the story of who we are and how we want to present ourselves to the world, but only to a limited extent. It is certainly not uncommon for schools to impose dress codes on students, but what benefits and damages are they really causing to educational environments? 

To much of the administration here at Sem, the new dress code has been seen as a way to better represent our school. Mrs. Bartron, an esteemed teacher and dean of the class of 2022, believes that “a dress code that requires our students to be clean and neat reflects our mission and core values – respect, integrity, and responsibility.” She also feels that “students and families have adjusted to this dress code, and it has accomplished its objectives” while also helping “to unite us in good ways” by encouraging communication between students, parents, and faculty with discussions that were had about these changes before the school year began. 

Some students, however, do not feel that the new limitations imposed upon their dress have benefited the environment of the school. Mya Pyke ‘22 expressed her frustrations with the new dress code by saying “it’s really annoying because we bought all of these clothes in the summer to get ready for the school year, and now we can’t even wear them—it’s just such a waste of money,” and a significant burden for families that cannot afford to purchase an entirely new, dress-code-approved wardrobe whenever the school chooses to modify its regulations. Pyke also feels that “the school should take into consideration how much money we had to spend on clothes for last year” before making such drastic changes to what we have to wear, as “it’s insensitive of money” and “not everyone can afford that stuff.” Angelo Lombardo ‘22 also explains that some aspects of the dress code are inconvenient for students because “it’s expensive to change what we wear … we all have so many hoodies, and it’s a pain to carry a winter coat around all day,” and this is especially true when a heavy coat is not necessary. Another student of the class of ‘21 who prefers to remain anonymous echoed this sentiment strongly by saying that “the school should refund us for the extra money we had to spend this year.” Though this may not be a very realistic option, dress codes indeed impose a financial strain on many families in addition to the existing costs of private education. 

Other students don’t support the dress code because they feel that it unfairly targets female students. Though all students can no longer wear Sem sweatshirts or t-shirts to school, some think that girls are experiencing more restrictions on their clothing than boys. Samantha Barcia ‘22 believes that the “dress code is heavily targeted towards girls, especially because boys are still allowed to wear the pants that they always have in cold weather, but it’s much harder for girls to find pants to wear” when it’s cold outside due to “the ban on colored jeans.” She explains that “in all honesty, the majority of girls aren’t wearing those kinds of pants (chinos) and they don’t own them already,” whereas “khakis are a regular pant style for boys.” Some girls would rather be cold during the wintertime than wear the pants that have become our only option, as “we would rather feel confident at school” when with our peers. 

Many students are feeling dissatisfied with the dress code for a variety of reasons, but what power do students really have to change the rules? Mrs. Barton recommends that “students [that are] interested in any modifications” should have “conversations with Mr. Morris, class deans, and Student Government” about what they think could “be the right next steps” for the dress code. Whether we believe that the dress code supports Sem’s ideals as a school, violates our freedom to express ourselves, places an unnecessary financial strain on our families, or targets individual members of the student body more than others, this new policy does affect us all. However, the choice for students still remains: will those against this new policy fight appropriately for change, or will the new dress code stay the way that it is in years to come? 

 

Keeping Concomitants in the Classroom

Keeping Concomitants in the Classroom

By Ms. Miller’s Bell 4 Journalism Class

Tim Crane ‘20, Josh Wufsus ‘21, and Jenny Yao ‘21 sit on the steps of the KCCA.
They are learning about Cain and Abel during their Bible class,
which they are required to take to graduate.

Imagine you’re a rising senior, looking forward to filling your schedule with fun classes like ceramics, forensics, or ornithology, only to hear your advisor say you still have to finish your concomitants. Rolling your eyes and letting out a sigh, you plead, “but why?” Why indeed? While it may seem like a pain to try and fit these classes into a schedule, they are important to fulfill for graduation. In reality, concomitants are beneficial in bringing opportunities to discover skills in subjects usually overlooked. Taking these classes makes well-rounded students, and they prepare them for school and beyond.

According to the Classes & Sequences of Wyoming Seminary, concomitants are classes necessary for graduation but not one of the core subjects of grammar/literature, mathematics, science, history, and foreign language. Requiring students to take concomitants sets them on the right path to becoming a well-rounded student. According to Ms. Frosini, associate director of college guidance, “Wyoming Seminary’s defined mission is to educate the ‘whole person.’” Class Dean of 2023 Mrs. Swaback says “It is important to take time out of traditional academics to teach cultural health and vital aspects of life.” 

Bible and Art History gives us an insight into a culture that of which we may not be familiar. Public speaking helps build communication skills that one will use throughout one’s entire life in both business and personal matters, like a big presentation in the first week of college, a first job interview, or simply just meeting a new person. Sem teaches us these skills because they want their students to succeed on their own, which is only possible because of concomitants.

Additionally, there is research that proves that concomitants are useful in a student’s life. The Hill School is a competitive private school located about ninety miles south of Sem. According to Hill’s handbook, they require three terms of arts and one term of religion in order to graduate. Their students average an SAT score of 1340 and an ACT score of 26, ranking them among the top 20 boarding schools, says Boarding School Review. Along with the Hill School, various other schools require certain classes. One being Shady Side Academy, which requires numerous art programs. According to BSR, they average an SAT score of 1350 and a 29 on their ACTs, putting them above many private schools who do not have required classes. 

Now, when you hear the word “concomitants,” do not be upset that you are required to take them. Rather, feel lucky you are being forced to step out of your comfort zone. Who knows? Maybe you will find yourself deeply interested in art history or discover your new passion for playing the recorder.

The Day of Silence: My Experience on Being Silently Supportive

The Day of Silence: My Experience on Being Silently Supportive

By Ally Sayed ’21

The GLSEN’s Day of Silence is an annual, student-led day to spread awareness about the effects of bullying on members of the LGBTQ+ community. Wyoming Seminary has taken part in the Day of Silence before, but April 12th, 2019, is the first time that I showed my support being silent. I will admit that I thought it was going to be easy, since I consider myself to be a quiet person. However, I could not have been more wrong.

Staying silent was difficult from the beginning of the day, and it only got harder as the day went on. As one would expect, I struggled to communicate without using my voice. There were times where I would forget about my vow to stay silent and started speaking, but I did my best to remain silent all day. The biggest struggle was trying to communicate with my peers. I did everything from using a pen and pencil to texting them, even while I was sitting right next to them.

After the day was over, I came to two major realizations. First, I learned that I take the opportunities I have to speak for granted. I have a voice that I can use to talk about my opinions and views, and I should be using that voice more often than I do. I couldn’t have realized this without staying silent. Second, I learned that feeling like you can’t speak, even though you have things to say, is one of the worst feelings in the world. It’s gutting knowing exactly how to express yourself, but not being able to do it. The fact that many members of the LGBTQ+ community have to face this feeling every day is terrible.

Many people who chose not be silent supported the day in other ways. A lot my peers showed their support by simply saying, “I support you,” or, “What you’re doing today is great.” The overall energy from the Sem community was embracing, and I hope that energy carries on beyond the Day of Silence.

Overall, the day effectively brought attention to the issue of bullying and harassment that the LGBTQ+ community faces. I hope everyone, whether they participated or not, can learn from the Day of Silence.